{"id":19355,"date":"2021-06-11T20:27:57","date_gmt":"2021-06-11T18:27:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bacciardipartners.it\/?p=19355"},"modified":"2022-03-08T12:44:11","modified_gmt":"2022-03-08T11:44:11","slug":"rules-and-anarchy-in-the-workplace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bacciardipartners.it\/en\/rules-and-anarchy-in-the-workplace\/","title":{"rendered":"Rules and anarchy in the workplace"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

The Court of Venice sanctions the employee who did not wear the protective mask in a company meeting and invited colleagues not to use it.<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Comment on the judgment of the Court of Venice 4.06.2021 by Andrea Russo – Employment Law<\/a> Area<\/p>\n

Download this article in printable version.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Regole_e_anarchia_sul_posto_di_lavoro_Bacciardi_and_Partners\"<\/p>\n

The “Covid litigation” begins to show up in the courtrooms: in this case, the Court of Venice has ruled on the legitimacy of a conservative sanction, imposed to an employee who had not worn the protective mask during a meeting company and, also, had posted on the company notice board a communication with which he had basically invited his colleagues not to wear the mask because such an obligation would be “unconstitutional and illegal\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Court of Venice, confirming the legitimacy of the sanction imposed to the employee (3 days’ suspension), recalled that:<\/p>\n