Focus SME Aggregation | A Growth Strategy for Italy’s Mid-Market.

Integrazione verticale nelle PMI del mid market: magazzino industriale con linea di movimentazione merci e pacco su nastro trasportatore, simbolo di controllo della filiera e aggregazioni industriali. Articolo di Lorenzo Bacciardi, CEO di Bacciardi Partners, su strategia industriale e aggregazioni PMI.

In the Italian manufacturing mid market, growth does not depend only on size, but on positioning along the value chain.
How significant is today’s dependence on one or two key suppliers?
How much does having a single customer that absorbs half of total volumes matter?
And to what extent does this structure affect investments, financing, and valuation?
The editorial project Focus on SME Aggregation | Growth strategies for the Italian mid market was created to analyse the main aggregation strategies from an industrial, not theoretical, perspective.

After the first contribution dedicated to mergers of equals, this second article addresses a different but complementary topic: vertical integration among operators along the same value chain as a response to critical dependencies and structural volatility.

Dependence on a few players as a structural weakness of the mid market

Many SMEs in the Italian manufacturing mid market depend critically on one or two key suppliers or customers, which often account for 40–60% of total volumes.
This configuration is not an exception, but a recurring element in discussions with entrepreneurs and industrial families.

An SME that purchases 50% of its raw materials or critical components from a single supplier is inevitably exposed to price volatility, logistical bottlenecks, and the risk of operational disruptions.
Likewise, a company that generates 60% of its revenues from a single dominant customer faces a commercial dependency that limits strategic autonomy and bargaining power.

In both cases, this fragility directly affects investments, bankability, and the overall valuation of the company.

Vertical integration as an industrial, not financial, response

Vertical integration addresses these dependencies at their root.
It is not a tactical choice, but an industrial decision that turns a structural weakness into a defensible competitive advantage.

The acquisition of a strategic supplier (upstream integration) or a key distributor (downstream integration) makes it possible to internalise margins along the value chain, stabilise production and commercial flows, improve quality control, and reduce logistics costs.

In the €10–150 million Enterprise Value segment, this strategy is once again becoming central precisely because it responds to volatility that has now become structural.

From a banking perspective, a vertically integrated company is more solid because it is less exposed to external shocks.
For institutional investors and strategic buyers, an integrated value chain generates higher valuation multiples—typically 7–9x EBITDA, compared to 5–6x for non-integrated operators.

How to structure the transaction without destroying value

Vertical integration does not necessarily require the full acquisition of the target.
In practice, the most effective transactions we have structured involve flexible alternatives.

The acquisition of 100% of the target remains a viable option. In other cases, industrial partnerships with qualified minority stakes between 30% and 49% allow companies to achieve commercial control and operational stability without full equity integration.

Governance becomes critical: internal transfer pricing, shared investment policies, clear exit rules, and earn-out mechanisms linked to guaranteed volumes, supply quality, and operational integration milestones. Without these safeguards, integration remains merely theoretical.

When integration creates measurable value

Industrial examples are tangible.
An automotive components manufacturer that acquires its special alloys supplier gains cost and lead-time stability, product co-development capabilities, and a competitive barrier that is difficult to replicate.

A specialised manufacturer that acquires its main distributor or retail customer builds an integrated production–distribution platform with higher margins.
A processor that acquires its steel supplier reduces exposure to volatility and secures certified supplies, also from an ESG perspective.

In all these cases, vertical integration is not a bet, but a lever for measurable and defensible value creation over time.

Want to know more?

If your company depends on one or two suppliers, distributors, resellers, or customers representing more than 40% of volumes; if you face constant pressure on prices and commercial terms; the strategic question is simple: continue to suffer the value chain, or start controlling it?

Our role is to support entrepreneurs in designing strategies and solutions for dimensional growth, identifying the critical link in the value chain and structuring vertical integration transactions that create real value for entrepreneurs and industrial families.

Contact us for a no-obligation meeting.

Avv. Lorenzo Bacciardi – CEO, Bacciardi Partners

Read also:
“From competitors to partners: mergers of equals as a response to consolidation”

Coming next:

  • Peer aggregation for specialisation and R&D – technology-driven M&A in the Italian mid market;

  • Cross-regional peer M&A – from local champions to national platforms;

  • M&A and SMEs: you are never ready. The real work starts before the transaction.